ROBINS-I: A Tool For Assessing Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomised Studies Of Interventions

·2016·DOI
Health Sciences and Innovation
Health Sciences
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
Methodological Framework for Meta-Analyses

Role in the Field

Neutralin Health Sciences and Innovation
Neutralin Health Sciences
Neutralin Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
Neutralin Methodological Framework for Meta-Analyses

Abstract

Citations

11,052

Year

2016

PageRank

4.8 / 10

Relative influence (log-scaled)

Related Papers

10 of 10 papers

PRISMA 2020 Explanation And Elaboration: Updated Guidance And Exemplars For Reporting Systematic Reviews
·2021·5,236 citations
PRISMA Extension For Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist And Explanation
·2018·21,187 citations
Systematic Review Or Scoping Review? Guidance For Authors When Choosing Between A Systematic Or Scoping Review Approach
·2018·6,210 citations
AMSTAR 2: A Critical Appraisal Tool For Systematic Reviews That Include Randomised Or Non-Randomised Studies Of Healthcare Interventions, Or Both
·2017·5,894 citations
The PRISMA Extension Statement For Reporting Of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses Of Health Care Interventions: Checklist And Explanations
·2015·5,301 citations
The PRISMA Statement For Reporting Systematic Reviews And Meta-Analyses Of Studies That Evaluate Healthcare Interventions: Explanation And Elaboration
·2009·14,436 citations
Introduction To Meta-Analysis
·2009·8,504 citations
Measuring Inconsistency In Meta-Analyses
·2003·50,440 citations
Trim And Fill: A Simple Funnel-Plot-Based Method Of Testing And Adjusting For Publication Bias In Meta-Analysis
·2000·10,757 citations
The Feasibility Of Creating A Checklist For The Assessment Of The Methodological Quality Both Of Randomised And Non-Randomised Studies Of Health Care Interventions
·1998·6,559 citations